Forum

Messages In This Thread

• American Idiot is this caller's name. *NM*
  • That guy's no idiot. He's saying to overthrow the federal government through the local state legislatures. Interesting idea. *NM*
    • States rights movements always fails because the consipation and bill of goods dont actually give rights to anyone. Allen in NY is the best caller. Hal Turner will never expose how state rights are aloosing cause because it was all invented with fraud in the first place because as Hal well knows, the FEDS OWN YOU. time to do some learning how States rights do not apply to the private individual IE: average lower class uneducated Hate and flame poster (ITS A CORPORATE DOCUMENT AND law)
      • ***because constipation CONSTITUTION (typo) *NM*
      • Wrong. It didn't start out as a fraud. The united States (small "u") didn't become a corporation, i.e. the United States until 1871 when Congress sold out the American people and states to the kike international bankers because the u.S. was already in debt to those demons in shoe leather as a consequence of the War of Northern Aggression. Turdner's a rat bastard tool of the United States Corporation, so don't expect him to tell you this, not that a dumbass like you would even know the difference in the first place, though the REAL "999" certainly would and did. *NM*
        • Better yet, UNITED STATES corporation (all caps just like your name, your corporate straw man, when it appears on all documents when you deal with the government or other corporations). *NM*
          • Fuck off, nobody cares what you think, especially twice. Learn how to get your point across in one post!! *NM*
            • that wasnt me^ a second post just means someone expanding on their previous comment not necissarily responding to their own post *NM*
            • Hey Unwiped/Sgt. Sockpuppet, it's called correcting a typo. I'm already quite skilled at getting my points across in one post while you can't even do it using infinite posts. Unless of course you're posting about your great hero Todd Daugherty, lol! You're still and will always be the ultimate Fucktard™! ;-) *NM*
              • just what part of "shut up nobody fucking cares..." don't you get jew boy? *NM*
        • time will surely remove your boastfulness Woody so once your age mellows you out you will find out that you are grasping at straws with regards to your 1871 designation. You reside in the state of confusion regarding international admiralty law. The constitution was for the framers not WOODCHIPPERSINC. non of the original consitutions of the org 13 states was ever submitted to the people to be ratified
          • Sorry,"Mr. English Is Not My First Or Any Language". No confusion here. Unlike you, I already know about the Roman Civil Law,, a/k/a Admiralty and Maritime Law that we now live under, symbolized by the American flag with the gold fringe. BTW, dummy, the original "Constitution for the united states of America" safeguarded the God given rights of the people, which have since been subverted after the corporate "CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" came into being in 1871. This led, among other things, to the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913 and the illegal income tax in 1916, but I doubt a moron like you has ever been gainfully employed, so you wouldn't understand a concept as abstract as tax on income. You really don't understand much of anything else either, Fake 999/RABBI KEVIN DEEN ROBERTS. ;-) *NM*
            • WRONG. IT DID START OUT AS A PURE PLAY FRAUD CON. ALL EVIDENCE GETS THROWN OUT OF COURT WHEN IT CANNOT COMPLY WITH PROVING CAUSE UNDER AHERETOFORE AGREEMENT WHICH IN THIS CASE WAS YOUR BELOVED AND BETHROTHED CONSTIPATION. 1871
              • Typing your erroneous assertions in all caps, just like the corporate strawman, doesn't make you correct or accurate. 1871 was the year the rot set in. Some people claim it came in with the 1938 Supreme Court case, Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkin, or with the E.O. confiscating all privately owned gold in 1933. Things certainly got worse in those years, but it really started in 1871 whether you like it or not. Then again, the fact that you're listening to a ZOG shill like Count Turnoffsky/Turdner means that a neo-cohn dummy like you wouldn't understand any of this in the first place. You might as well be listening to Flush Rimjob, Hannitool or Skid-Mark Levine. ;-) *NM*
            • In the interest of full disclosure mr.chips. I do not reside in America or hold Citizenship there or have ever liveed in J.O.G. lulz *NM*
              • No shit, lol. You don't hide if very well. Still, it's been a LONG time (maybe even going back to the days of the REAL 999 and RABBI KEVIN DEAN ROBERTS, who I knew VERY well!) since I've been able to have an extended conversation with anybody in this septic tank of a forum concerning even a remotely serious topic, so I have to give you some credit for that, at least. ;-) *NM*
                • Thanks. gotta keep in with people including friends and fam now a days under these IMF WORLD BANK austerity restrictions just for being able to get you food shud thing go helter skelter and you cannot get out *NM*
      • The guy's idea is solid: Get 27 state legislatures to proclaim they do not recognize the federal government. This can be done because the GOP controls almost all the local and state levels of government. *NM*
        • the states are party to the corporation of the USA but you are not. Supreme courts or any lower court throws out any mention of the constipation right off the bat in any legal case if its brought up, thats why the lawsuits the Trump campaign files dont go anywhere, appeals court doesnt take states rights as anything other than some Russian hoax to break up Amerikwa *NM*
          • You become party to the corporation through your all capital letter STRAW MAN, the corporate fiction, as I mentioned above. However, knowing this info and trying to act as a sovereign isn't even good enough any more. If you try to inform the parasitic tyrants who rule over us of this, they just ignore it and get their paid musclemen, i.e., "brave heroes and warriors in uniform" to either imprison or kill you. *NM*
            • thats what im sayin, they did (FEDZ) an end run around the constipation in 1787 in STATE VS. DISTRICT
              • True they did overstep their authority with the Whiskey Rebellion, but that wasn't until 1791. Nonetheless, the Corporate criminality with its corporation didn't come in until 1871. *NM*
            • mostly that straw man stuff get invoked then you have to prove you are operating commercially because if you are just a common law grunt doing your private business you dont come under state statues *NM*
              • Yes, you need to do that by filing paperwork in which you legally take control of your STRAW MAN. The problem is, though it should work in theory, in practice, they ignore you and the paperwork and just steamroll over you if you try. *NM*
                • yES first heard about doing that by Terry Cook
                  • Would you be interested in sucking on my dick? *NM*
        • 27 state legislatures? Reality check: you won't get even ONE state legislature to disavow recognition of the criminal Federal government. Republicunt, democrap, makes no difference. They're ALL crooks working for the Corporation. And good luck in finding any "constitutional sheriffs", either. They're supposed to be the most powerful law enforcement officers in their respective counties, but they're all traitors as well since they do whatever the Federal and State Corporate gubmit officials tell them to do. *NM*
          • thats just not how executive jurisdiction works the Judiciary would have to take your account into your state rights lawhood and they dont so neither you nor I cannot change this *NM*
            • Just as I've been saying: they IGNORE you and just STEAMROLL over your rights, even if you claim control of your STRAW MAN!! And yes, if we had common law courts, the criminal tyrants could not do what they do. Problem is, good luck in finding and staffing a common law court. :-( *NM*
              • Corporate charters of the crown dont care about your common law when it comes to State rights. That happened in around 1783 definition at law that governs the crown is different from your own personal BS or beliefs on states succeeding which deep states actors represented as cuming from Russia back in 2009 or before *NM*
                • I take back what I said above: you really ARE a nitwit. They're not my personal beliefs. The "Corporate" U.S. became a reality in 1871, and the citizens were sovereign prior to that, whether you like it or not. If you knew anything you wouldn't be listening to Halvin. Only dumbasses listen to Corporate traitors like Hal Turdner. *NM*
                  • Chips... its hard being a drunk trying to dissect law. Check out MARSHALL v. LOVELASS, 1 N.C. 412 (1801) the state granted property and only then were you a party to any rights or a soverign but The corporate united states only became a reality in 1871 and the citizens were sovereign prior to that, whether you like it or not. Corporate charter laws protect corporations from illegal things they do so the state protections which we started this thead off on regard law that governs the Crown, not you, since you are just citing lip service to your name *NM*
                    • Then you need to stop drinking, 999. It's not surprising that somebody who listens to Turdner wouldn't know what he's talking about, but you do not. And your 1801 court case was only for North Carolina, not the other states, but otherwise, it still doesn't mean squat here. Individual citizens (NOT the government) were considered sovereigns (NOT corporate entities) under the Declaration of Independence and The Constitution for the united states of America (small "u" and small "s" there). And just to correct you: it was the CORPORATE United States (CAPITAL "U" and "S") which became a reality in 1871, but that's ok, I realize you're a little slow. Sober up, brush up on your English, and stop listening to Turdner and other neo-cohns and instead find some racial patriots as info sources. That is if you're even White, which I sort of doubt at this point. *NM*